In 2010, David Keith gave a lecture at an event for scientists discussing the injections of chemicals into the atmosphere to mitigate “climate change.”
The injection of chemicals or particles into the atmosphere from aeroplanes is colloquially known as chemtrails. As Keith’s lecture demonstrates, solar radiation management, which includes chemtrails, is not a “conspiracy theory,” it is a conspiracy.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe to our emails now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
David Keith is a prominent physicist and climate scientist, currently a Professor of Geophysical Sciences at the University of Chicago (having moved from Harvard University in 2023), who is a leading advocate for the research and potential application of solar geoengineering to mitigate “climate change.”
He specialises in solar radiation management (“SRM”), specifically the injection of reflective particles into the stratosphere (when injected into the atmosphere from aeroplanes, these are colloquially known as chemtrails) to mimic the cooling effect of volcanic eruptions like Mount Pinatubo. Keith argues that this approach could quickly lower global temperatures, reduce climate risks and buy time for societies to achieve net-zero carbon emissions and develop carbon removal technologies. From 2014/2015 until it was cancelled in 2024, he worked with atmospheric chemist James G. Anderson and later with principal investigator Frank Keutsch in the “sun-dimming” project SCoPEx, which was funded by Bill Gates.
“David Keith and other geoengineers [at SCoPEx] … are not dispassionate scientists, but entrepreneurs backed by venture capitalists who stand to become fabulously wealthy if governments should opt to move forward with an SRM project in the future,” Heinrich Boell Foundation said in its ‘SCoPEx Geoengineering Briefing’.
Before moving into SRM, Keith was invested in nonsensical carbon dioxide removal (“CDR”) strategies. In 2009, Keith co-founded Carbon Engineering, a Canadian company developing CDR technology. In 2023, Carbon Engineering was acquired by Occidental Petroleum for $1.1 billion, with Keith holding approximately 4% ownership before the sale. 15 years after its founding, the company “united” with Oxy and its subsidiary 1PointFive to introduce its Direct Air Capture (“DAC”) technology at a commercial scale across the globe.
In 2010, before Carbon Engineering was sold, Keith gave a lecture at the American Association for the Advancement of Science (“AAAS”). It was part of a series of three talks about using geoengineering to modify the Earth’s climate.
“Geoengineering looks like it is so cheap that the cost is basically not going to be an issue. That means that implementation decisions will be risk-to-risk decisions: the risk of doing it against the risk of not doing it.”
It’s cheap to deliver materials into the stratosphere, he insisted and didn’t think that would change in the future. “But I think the more we do research, the less easy this will look, the more complicated the environmental effects will look. And that’s a good thing because right now it looks too easy, so I think that if we do more research, we’re likely to find out that it’s harder and more complicated than we thought, and the side effects are harder to manage.”
He appears to be cautious about SRM, but as we shall conclude, not about geoengineering. It just depends on which geoengineering technique stands to profit him the most.
The key point to note about Keith’s lecture is that more than 15 years ago, he was openly talking about using chemtrails that contain sulphates and aluminium to a group of “scientists” who claim they are “advancing science.” Have any of those “scientists” informed the public or expressed concern? Not AAAS, it would seem. In 2013, AAAS again promoted Keith’s agenda.
In an article reporting on a US Congress briefing, AAAS said, “Reducing greenhouse gas emissions or adapting to their consequences are the best-known strategies for dealing with climate change, but geoengineering strategies deserve closer attention, experts said at a Capitol Hill briefing.”
“[SRM] may be a relatively fast and cheap fix, Keith said, but he also called the approach ‘imperfect and uncertain’.”
Chemtrails are not a “conspiracy theory,” they are a conspiracy, surrounded by a conspiracy of silence, and judging by those attending AAAS’s 2011 annual event and the fact that the US Congress is briefed about them, more know about it or suspect it is happening than care to admit.
We should point out that Keith’s “imperfect and uncertain” comment does not mean he was opposing geoengineering; he was merely backing his current venture.
Leaving us to suspect that Keith only appeared to be warning against SRM in 2013 because he had investments in a carbon dioxide removal company (CDR is another geoengineering technique), AAAS’ article concludes:
While speakers [at Capitol Hill] presented different approaches to climate engineering, Keith stressed there is no need to group all forms of geoengineering together into one programme.
“Solar Radiation Management has, I think, no useful connections to carbon dioxide removal,” Keith said. “They’re not more connected to each other than either of them are to abatement, reducing emissions, or to adaptation.”
Keith has been involved in Gates-funded SRM but only since 2014, the year after the Capitol Hill briefing. In 2013, he stood to gain personally from CDR, but not from SRM. It was only from 2014 that he stood to gain from SRM. For Keith, it’s all about the money.
Related:
- UN considers allowing geoengineering for carbon credits despite UN banning geoengineering
- Video: Shocking statements from the world’s most recognised geoengineer, Dr. David Keith, Geoengineering Watch via Donmar316 on Rumble
- Lies, Deception and David Keith, Geoengineering Watch, 5 June 2014
David Keith (Harvard University): Atmospheric Geoengineering with Aluminium Aerosols (“Chemtrails”), 7 October 2010
In the description of Escape the Matrix’s video above, Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez provided a good deal of information on 9/11. It is unrelated to the David Keith lecture but we are preserving it, should the video be removed from YouTube, by republishing the text below.
Lecture by scientist David Keith (Harvard University) on the use of aluminium aerosols for atmospheric geoengineering to combat global warming.
Article discussing the concept of dumping aerosolised aluminium-based nano-particles into our atmosphere to reflect sunlight and reduce global warming: ‘Could precisely engineered nanoparticles provide a novel geoengineering tool?’.
Technical paper putting forth the idea of dumping aerosolised aluminium nano-particles into our atmosphere, by David W. Keith: ‘Photophoretic levitation of engineered aerosols for geoengineering’.
Dear Fellow Truth Supporter,
My name is Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez, and I am a medical student. Throughout my rigorous undergraduate science and medical science coursework, I have had the privilege of receiving extensive training in the process of scientific analysis and evidence-based thinking.
I am writing to you today not only as a medical student, but also as a concerned American citizen, to ask for your help with something very important.
Have you heard of Dr. Judy Wood? Did you know she has been researching 9/11 since 2001 and has already filed several lawsuits against NIST’s contractors for scientific fraud, and legal requests that NIST’s fraudulent data gets re-examined? Dr. Judy Wood has received more than one threat due to the research she has done and the evidence she has gathered, and one of her students was also murdered in 2006. Surprisingly, Dr. Judy Wood is the only 9/11 researcher who has submitted evidence to the courts in pursuit of the truth.
I. In 2007, Dr. Judy Wood filed several legal cases against the corporations NIST had contracted to conduct the 9/11 “investigations,” many of which are military/ defence/ weapons organisations involved in Directed Energy research (huge conflict-of-interest). The filings in these legal cases included Requests For Corrections (“RFC”) based on the Data Quality Act, and Qui Tam whistle-blower cases. One of her legal cases made it all the way to the US Supreme Court in October of 2009. She has been actively pursuing 9/11 Truth with her lawyer, despite the lack of support she has received from Dr. Steven Jones and other members of the 9/11 Truth community. The legal documents from her court cases can be viewed at the following links:
- Listing of RFCs to NIST and Other Legal Challenges
- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK: DR. JUDY WOOD on behalf of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff/Relator vs. Defendants
II. Dr. Judy Wood has collected an overwhelming amount of evidence which suggests that a Directed Energy Weapon of some kind was used to powderise (“dustify”) the primary steel and concrete portions of the WTC [World Trade Centre] buildings, while burning and bending aluminium, yet leaving paper and many other materials unharmed. These characteristics are matched by those of “The Hutchison Effect,” and are the result of “field effects” and energy interference. John Hutchison has filed an affidavit in Dr. Wood’s court case to legally testify to the numerous similarities between The Hutchison Effect and the 9/11 attacks.
III. Dr. Judy Wood received her B.S. (Civil Engineering, 1981) (Structural Engineering), M.S. (Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics), 1983), and PhD (Materials Engineering Science, 1992) from the Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, Virginia. Her dissertation involved the development of an experimental method to measure thermal stresses in bi-material joints. She has taught courses including: Experimental Stress Analysis, Engineering Mechanics, Mechanics of Materials (Strength of Materials), and Strength of Materials Testing.
- Dr. Judy Wood, PhD – ‘The New Hiroshima’ Presentation (Part 1): HERE [No longer available on YouTube]
- Dr. Judy Wood’s evidence-packed website: HERE [Website no longer available]
- A very important, related website: HERE
IV. Here are some very important video documentaries discussing the reality of The Hutchison Effect and other suppressed technologies, such as Cold Fusion, Anti-Gravity, and Military Energy Weapon Technology, which are related to 9/11:
- John Hutchison & The Hutchison Effect (Documentary | 68mins): HERE [No longer available on Google]
- Heavy Watergate: The Cold Fusion Cover Up (Documentary | 45mins): HERE [No longer available on Google]
- Boyd Bushman, a Senior Scientist of Lockheed Martin, on The Hutchison Effect: HERE
- Colonel Tom Bearden on Military Energy Weapon Technology (1985), similar to The Hutchison Effect: HERE [No longer available on YouTube]
- What Turned The Twin Towers To DUST on 9/11? HERE
Thank you for your time, consideration, and help,
– Abe
Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez, M2 Medical Student, B.S. Biology / Neurobiology
Featured image taken from ‘Chemtrails: why is RFK Jr battling a debunked conspiracy theory?’ The Guardian, 12 June 2025
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News, World News
More and more of this stuff is making it into alternative press. One or other day the dam will break and all that has been hushed and kept from the public will come out. From the technicians who found the piping in toilets of a plane they were repairing, to several engineers who find the 911 story completely bull, it will all come out. One day the bottom will drop out. And then recently, all these rocket scientists in the US and in China, who died or disappeared. Something very, very fishy is going on
Hi Rhoda,
Another topic of topics.
Iran has had a draught for the last 15 years, all the wells were empty.
After they had destroyed the US Nexrad stations, during the US attacks.
They now have full wells and reservoir’s, due to all the rain.
How strange is that ?
Thank You for touching this extremely important topic. A VERY GOOD introduction is at the most recent series of interviews: https://rumble.com/v79d2om-lets-try-these-two-theyre-spraying-poison-in-our-skies-geoengineering-expos.html
Haven’t seen that, many thanks for the link. I’ll also pass it on.
And co.plete nonsense. 60 billion cubic miles of atmosphere…have a sense of scale. Zero empirical proof for these claims. As soon as you do any kind of logistics or scaling it falls apart. For example, watched a video about crossing the Atlantic on the QM2 and what do we see? Contrails, long persistent, what are they chemtrailing out there eh? Nothing because its WATER VAPOUR.
I think you need to “read the planet”. No one thinks like you anymore. Governments, pilots have all admitted it. When this started decades ago, they talked openly about it.
Just thought you might be interested in this. A ‘Climate Change’ researcher, called, Andrew LOCKLEY, is the leader in ‘Solar Geo Engineering’. Would you believe it…it’s called:
“Stratospheric Aerosol Transport And Nucleation,” or….SATAN. Of course, it is!
https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/03/01/1069283/researchers-launched-a-solar-geoengineering-test-flight-in-the-uk-last-fall/
just wanted to run this by you. Career opportunities in Geo-Engineering availability. http://weathermodification.com/careers.php
https://pilotcareercenter.com/Air-Carrier-PCC-Profile/3674/Weather-Modification-Int'l https://www.simplyhired.com/job/O06D1TL0BTHKq-rG2C0RIPWVoHB1JbdCa8yliukPDOPW6WLsDD8QTg
Isn’t that most peculiar, as the Royal Aeronautical Society (RAS) said it was a conspiracy theory! Article here by the RAS: ‘Chemtrails Debunked’. https://www.aerosociety.com/news/chemtrails-debunked/
Ours is called The Solar System for good reason; mainly billions (that’s with a ‘b’) of years. If pseudo-scientists believe (belief not evidence) that they are of significance in The System (or The Universe, for that matter), perhaps they should be reminded that ‘to make god laugh tell her your plans’. Better still, update themselves with the scientists at Clintel.org. What climate emergency? Whatever, don’t ask King Charles! d’Oh.
GeoEngineeringWatch.org
ClimateViewer.com
Is it still April fools? Zero empirical evidence for this grift. WATER VAPOUR.
Please show some personal discernment and independent research.
Respectfully, here’s a starting point:
The Advanced Research and Invention Agency (ARIA) is funding various solar geoengineering projects in the UK, focusing on outdoor experiments to explore options for actively cooling the Earth. Additionally, Paddock Geo Engineering is a company involved in geo-environmental and geotechnical projects, which may include aspects of geoengineering.
Companies Involved in Geoengineering in the UKAdvanced Research + Invention Agency (ARIA)
Paddock Geo Engineering
Met Office
These organizations are at the forefront of geoengineering efforts in the UK, each contributing in different ways to the field.
https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/08613165/officers
Geoengineering refers to large-scale interventions in the Earth’s climate system to counteract climate change, such as solar radiation management or carbon dioxide removal. Unlike the conspiracy theory of chemtrails, which falsely claims that harmful substances are sprayed from aircraft, geoengineering involves scientifically studied methods aimed at climate mitigation.
Understanding GeoengineeringGeoengineering refers to large-scale interventions aimed at altering the Earth’s climate system to counteract climate change. It includes various techniques designed to reflect sunlight or remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.
Types of Geoengineering
Distinction from ChemtrailsChemtrails are a conspiracy theory suggesting that governments are secretly spraying harmful substances from aircraft for undisclosed purposes. In contrast, geoengineering is a scientifically studied field aimed at addressing climate change.
Current Status and RegulationsAs of now, there is no large-scale deployment of geoengineering technologies by the U.S. government. Some states have introduced laws to regulate or prohibit geoengineering activities, reflecting public concern over transparency and environmental impacts.
Understanding geoengineering is crucial as it represents potential solutions to climate challenges, distinct from unfounded theories like chemtrails.
Sulfur dioxide is generally considered safe for human consumption in small amounts, particularly as a food preservative, but it can cause serious reactions in sensitive individuals, especially those with asthma. High levels of exposure can lead to respiratory issues and other health problems.
Kennedy is a globalist ! ffs Rosalind Peterson. agriculture defense coalition.com