Online link to source site
News offline code
Misleading - The journalist who made the decision: gr_09
When it comes to the value of the journalistic information of the news being assessed, I think it is low. You can only notice that it is current. It is difficult to determine its reliability and faithfulness to facts because it is unclear and written in the form of fragments of statements and short comments. This is not a large-scale event, rather gossip about famous people. The event is not close because it concerns the USA and Great Britain. The information is not important because it refers to the guesses and possibility of a problem occurring in the future of the people discussed. The continuity of information is also disturbed because the headline suggests a reference to the conflict between Meghan Markle and her husband, and the news presents conflicts between the couple and the press or between the couple and the royal family. I do not believe that the news being prepared has personalized information. The headline announces tragedy, but there is no tragedy in the content. The same applies to drama and action. Overall, I assess the value of the information provided by this article as very low, despite its gossip nature. It is impossible to assess whether this information is true or not, because the content of the article is only guesswork.
